Photo: jacob: I wish this sort of thing worked. (I know that they add up to 3,600. Obviously it would be useful with more complex numbers. You guys are so fucking funny.) See that “relative” checkbox? click it. both fields revert to zero, and you can put “900” in the width, and it’ll add 900, relative to the current size.

jacob:


I wish this sort of thing worked.
(I know that they add up to 3,600. Obviously it would be useful with more complex numbers. You guys are so fucking funny.)



See that “relative” checkbox?  click it.  both fields revert to zero, and you can put “900” in the width, and it’ll add 900, relative to the current size.

jacob:

I wish this sort of thing worked.

(I know that they add up to 3,600. Obviously it would be useful with more complex numbers. You guys are so fucking funny.)

See that “relative” checkbox? click it. both fields revert to zero, and you can put “900” in the width, and it’ll add 900, relative to the current size.
  1. voiddd reblogged this from jacob
  2. saitamanodoruji reblogged this from reretlet
  3. johncoltrane reblogged this from slantback and added:
    Ho yeah! I know it doesn’t work, but I keep trying from time to time.
  4. reretlet reblogged this from zoker
  5. zoker reblogged this from jacob
  6. ianlee reblogged this from jacob
  7. slantback reblogged this from jacob
  8. austinwebdesigner reblogged this from jacob and added:
    See that “relative” checkbox? click it. both fields revert to zero, and you can put “900” in
  9. kumhianoa reblogged this from jacob
  10. migsambo reblogged this from jacob
  11. ben reblogged this from jacob and added:
    Jacob, it’s 3600.
  12. 200 reblogged this from jacob and added:
    learn some simple addition.
  13. jacob posted this
blog comments powered by Disqus